Rolf Harris Arrested.

Henry wrote:

philagain wrote:Rolf Harris being implicated in said abuse is mind boggling imo...So many stars are being implicated...I live with a survivor of child abuse and i just hope that the bandwagon theory is proven wrong because if anyone is lying they have a lot to answer for.

...Surely they can't all be quilty or perhaps they are

Child abuse is more commonplace than most will admit. I think it is entirely plausible that they can all be guilty.

Polly Juice wrote:

Henry wrote:

philagain wrote:Rolf Harris being implicated in said abuse is mind boggling imo...So many stars are being implicated...I live with a survivor of child abuse and i just hope that the bandwagon theory is proven wrong because if anyone is lying they have a lot to answer for.

...Surely they can't all be quilty or perhaps they are

Child abuse is more commonplace than most will admit. I think it is entirely plausible that they can all be guilty.

It is not only child abuse being investigated in these cases, some of it is sexual abuse of adults. They never make it plain enough when they announce someone has been questioned by police. But I do agree it is plausible that they are all guilty.

Polly Juice wrote:

Henry wrote:

philagain wrote:Rolf Harris being implicated in said abuse is mind boggling imo...So many stars are being implicated...I live with a survivor of child abuse and i just hope that the bandwagon theory is proven wrong because if anyone is lying they have a lot to answer for.

...Surely they can't all be quilty or perhaps they are

Child abuse is more commonplace than most will admit. I think it is entirely plausible that they can all be guilty.

It is not only child abuse being investigated in these cases, some of it is sexual abuse of adults. They never make it plain enough when they announce someone has been questioned by police. But I do agree it is plausible that they are all guilty.

xtras wrote:

Polly Juice wrote:

Henry wrote:

philagain wrote:Rolf Harris being implicated in said abuse is mind boggling imo...So many stars are being implicated...I live with a survivor of child abuse and i just hope that the bandwagon theory is proven wrong because if anyone is lying they have a lot to answer for.

...Surely they can't all be quilty or perhaps they are

Child abuse is more commonplace than most will admit. I think it is entirely plausible that they can all be guilty.

It is not only child abuse being investigated in these cases, some of it is sexual abuse of adults. They never make it plain enough when they announce someone has been questioned by police. But I do agree it is plausible that they are all guilty.

i thought it was children... you are right they are not very clear on this, i don't agree with naming the person publicly though, they could be innocent after all

Henry wrote:

xtras wrote:

Polly Juice wrote:

It is not only child abuse being investigated in these cases, some of it is sexual abuse of adults. They never make it plain enough when they announce someone has been questioned by police. But I do agree it is plausible that they are all guilty.

i thought it was children... you are right they are not very clear on this, i don't agree with naming the person publicly though, they could be innocent after all

The law should allow a suspect in any crime to choose whether they wish to remain anonymous or not until guilt is established.

xtras wrote:

Henry wrote:

xtras wrote:

Polly Juice wrote:

It is not only child abuse being investigated in these cases, some of it is sexual abuse of adults. They never make it plain enough when they announce someone has been questioned by police. But I do agree it is plausible that they are all guilty.

i thought it was children... you are right they are not very clear on this, i don't agree with naming the person publicly though, they could be innocent after all

The law should allow a suspect in any crime to choose whether they wish to remain anonymous or not until guilt is established.

i don't think it should be law to choose, i think it should be law to keep that matter private, you'd be surprised the harm it does to someone if they are innocent.. on all manner of things

xtras wrote:anonymity for both parties until a verdict is declared should be the case for all trials, we have seen what can be written & reported while a case is underway, they need to clamp down on that, too many trials by media... we have a secret police state, things are only reported what they want to report!! where you been H..

Henry wrote:

xtras wrote:anonymity for both parties until a verdict is declared should be the case for all trials, we have seen what can be written & reported while a case is underway, they need to clamp down on that, too many trials by media... we have a secret police state, things are only reported what they want to report!! where you been H..

I'm an idealist.

xtras wrote:

Henry wrote:

xtras wrote:anonymity for both parties until a verdict is declared should be the case for all trials, we have seen what can be written & reported while a case is underway, they need to clamp down on that, too many trials by media... we have a secret police state, things are only reported what they want to report!! where you been H..

I'm an idealist.

good for you.. doesn't take away the fact of what i said



remember that woman going about, saying so many men had raped her? those men were named & shamed but all innocent, she had some mental problems, they lost so called friends, one lost his job if i can remember, all because of her false accusations .

Big Fat Frosty wrote:even if the law was changed
ud still get leaks especially for the famous or infamous
a lot of the news of the world hacking case scandel
involves police officers receiving cash for leaks

Henry wrote:

xtras wrote:

Henry wrote:

I'm an idealist.

good for you.. doesn't take away the fact of what i said



remember that woman going about, saying so many men had raped her? those men were named & shamed but all innocent, she had some mental problems, they lost so called friends, one lost his job if i can remember, all because of her false accusations .

You seem to have misread what I wrote, we are in agreement:

"The law should allow a suspect in any crime to choose whether they wish to remain anonymous or not until guilt is established.""The suspect may want the world to know that he/she is facing charges - he/she may be relying on people to come forward on their behalf to help with their case.

xtras wrote:

Henry wrote:

xtras wrote:


i thought it was children... you are right they are not very clear on this, i don't agree with naming the person publicly though, they could be innocent after all

The law should allow a suspect in any crime to choose whether they wish to remain anonymous or not until guilt is established.

i don't think it should be law to choose, i think it should be law to keep that matter private, you'd be surprised the harm it does to someone if they are innocent.. on all manner of things